I was listening to a morning talk show during my morning commute and they were discussing the ongoing problems of a popular minister and his ministry here in Baltimore. Rumors abound that this minister, has issues with extemporaneous hoochies. No other way to put it...if you look at this brother, he exudes a hustler's mentality (IMO)...what folks call a "pimp in the pulpit". This host stated that many of his issues are with women and that his wife should understand or at least should've understood that she was marrying a man that women were going to be attraced to. I can't remember the exact quote, however, it went along the lines of women needing to understand that a man that is powerful and wealthy will have extra marital affairs, and that knowing that, they should turn a blind eye to a rich mans transgressions.
Now I understand that women are attracted to men with money and power, and in a sense I do understand why he said it, because we see so many "non attractive" wealthy men (i.e. athletes, entertainers, politicians) with extremely beautiful women. Added to that, these same men are puported to having several "side pieces"...however, I have to disagree with his statment, because once that man decides that he is going to committ himself to another via a civil and/or traditional ceremony, he at that point is supposed to forsake all others. What we are seeing is not a new phenomenon, because wealthy men throughout the ages have had several mistresses. And alot of their wives understood and recognized this. Still that does not make it right...
If a single man chooses to have a hundred women in his life, he can do so. He can roll over women 24/7...But a married man has opted out of the single life for his "one and only"...It should not matter how much money or power a man may have...He is saying that women give rich and powerful men a pass? And you know what, I tend to believe he is correct. We see it daily...Kobe gave his wife a ring after running up in some common ass tramp without a condom...this trick had various semen specimens in her panties and yet he did it anyway. BUT did his wife leave...no, she is accustomed to a lifestyle and maybe that is all that is important to her. You can't say she doesn't want to leave what they have built, because she hasn't built anything in a financial sense with him, maybe emotionally with the kids, I don't know...but my question's are "Do you think women give men with money more "second chances" than a man without money? Are women whores for money? Why do women stay with men that cheat? Should women automatically assume that if she marries a wealthy and powerful man that she will never be the sole woman in his life?
Your thoughts...
Sassyscribe
www.blogtalkradio.com/sassyentertainment
http://www.xcapadesofthegirlz.blogspot.com/
http://www.sapharibooks.com/
www.myspace.com/sassyscribe
http://www.asksassyscribe.blogspot.com/
Now I understand that women are attracted to men with money and power, and in a sense I do understand why he said it, because we see so many "non attractive" wealthy men (i.e. athletes, entertainers, politicians) with extremely beautiful women. Added to that, these same men are puported to having several "side pieces"...however, I have to disagree with his statment, because once that man decides that he is going to committ himself to another via a civil and/or traditional ceremony, he at that point is supposed to forsake all others. What we are seeing is not a new phenomenon, because wealthy men throughout the ages have had several mistresses. And alot of their wives understood and recognized this. Still that does not make it right...
If a single man chooses to have a hundred women in his life, he can do so. He can roll over women 24/7...But a married man has opted out of the single life for his "one and only"...It should not matter how much money or power a man may have...He is saying that women give rich and powerful men a pass? And you know what, I tend to believe he is correct. We see it daily...Kobe gave his wife a ring after running up in some common ass tramp without a condom...this trick had various semen specimens in her panties and yet he did it anyway. BUT did his wife leave...no, she is accustomed to a lifestyle and maybe that is all that is important to her. You can't say she doesn't want to leave what they have built, because she hasn't built anything in a financial sense with him, maybe emotionally with the kids, I don't know...but my question's are "Do you think women give men with money more "second chances" than a man without money? Are women whores for money? Why do women stay with men that cheat? Should women automatically assume that if she marries a wealthy and powerful man that she will never be the sole woman in his life?
Your thoughts...
Sassyscribe
www.blogtalkradio.com/sassyentertainment
http://www.xcapadesofthegirlz.blogspot.com/
http://www.sapharibooks.com/
www.myspace.com/sassyscribe
http://www.asksassyscribe.blogspot.com/
Comments